Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any compelling reason NOT to use a Nucleus 2.0?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yorke-1" data-source="post: 2416906" data-attributes="member: 11960"><p>You beat me by a hair, my Gen 1 is #0036! Lol</p><p></p><p></p><p>You'll probably need to use AICS style CIP mags. Accurate Mag sells a 3 round CIP length magazine for the 300 RUM that would give you the max OAL length without having a mag hanging too far below the stock. Then you just need to pick the CIP length bottom metal you like best. </p><p></p><p>My only real complaint with the Nucleus is that it's not compatible with a BDL style mag box or bottom metal. That's the only thing that's made me consider selling one of mine and replacing it with a Mausingfield.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yorke-1, post: 2416906, member: 11960"] You beat me by a hair, my Gen 1 is #0036! Lol You’ll probably need to use AICS style CIP mags. Accurate Mag sells a 3 round CIP length magazine for the 300 RUM that would give you the max OAL length without having a mag hanging too far below the stock. Then you just need to pick the CIP length bottom metal you like best. My only real complaint with the Nucleus is that it’s not compatible with a BDL style mag box or bottom metal. That’s the only thing that’s made me consider selling one of mine and replacing it with a Mausingfield. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Any compelling reason NOT to use a Nucleus 2.0?
Top