Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
And now they go after pistol braces
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SteelBanger" data-source="post: 2052975" data-attributes="member: 112192"><p>As the article states, the ambiguity of the proposal creates a bigger mess than the mess we have now. I thought the issue of brace legality was centered around whether or not you can "shoulder" a brace? The ATF has gone back and forth for years on that, and currently it is acceptable to shoulder a brace. I don't see the topic of shouldering anywhere in the article, is that to mean that the brace will be either legal or illegal, regardless of whether it is shouldered or not?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SteelBanger, post: 2052975, member: 112192"] As the article states, the ambiguity of the proposal creates a bigger mess than the mess we have now. I thought the issue of brace legality was centered around whether or not you can "shoulder" a brace? The ATF has gone back and forth for years on that, and currently it is acceptable to shoulder a brace. I don't see the topic of shouldering anywhere in the article, is that to mean that the brace will be either legal or illegal, regardless of whether it is shouldered or not? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
And now they go after pistol braces
Top