Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Aerodynamic Jump and Ballistic Solutions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrankPetersenDK" data-source="post: 865004" data-attributes="member: 45071"><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">MMERS.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">Thank you for your response. Just what I was looking for. I follow your reasoning all the way. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">Even though all calculated deflections (horizontal and vertical) related to wind are scientifically correct, we must – as you point out – remember, that wind by its very nature is non-deterministic. We can only measure direction and wind force at our <strong>exact</strong> location and not for the entire length of the bullet's flight. Consequently, your comments, regarding confidentiality of our wind reading capabilities, are very appropriate. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">I would appreciate it, if you would expand on your method for establishing your maximum effective range (MER). I have read Bryan's article regarding this issue, and understand that he is using simulation software to arrive at his numbers. However, I have tried to emulate his calculations in a excel spreadsheet, and it works, even though I had to spend some time getting it right. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'">Thanks again for your input.</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrankPetersenDK, post: 865004, member: 45071"] [SIZE=3][FONT=Calibri]MMERS.[/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Calibri]Thank you for your response. Just what I was looking for. I follow your reasoning all the way. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Calibri]Even though all calculated deflections (horizontal and vertical) related to wind are scientifically correct, we must – as you point out – remember, that wind by its very nature is non-deterministic. We can only measure direction and wind force at our [B]exact[/B] location and not for the entire length of the bullet’s flight. Consequently, your comments, regarding confidentiality of our wind reading capabilities, are very appropriate. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Calibri]I would appreciate it, if you would expand on your method for establishing your maximum effective range (MER). I have read Bryan’s article regarding this issue, and understand that he is using simulation software to arrive at his numbers. However, I have tried to emulate his calculations in a excel spreadsheet, and it works, even though I had to spend some time getting it right. [/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=3][FONT=Calibri]Thanks again for your input.[/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Aerodynamic Jump and Ballistic Solutions
Top