Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Accuracy: Wood vs Synthetic vs Laminate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iSnipe" data-source="post: 334737" data-attributes="member: 13596"><p>Instead of me listing what I know, or think I know about accuracy issues, pro or con, about certain</p><p>stocks, I'll just leave it open to all replies.</p><p> </p><p>I should leave laminate stocks out of this because I have no interest in them. Since it does fit in the</p><p>with the line of questioning, if you want to respond to that, it's ok.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Is one kind of stock more inherently accurate than another?</strong> I'm talking what it is made from.</p><p> </p><p><strong>If said stock is more accurate, why?</strong></p><p> </p><p><strong>What makes one stock more accurate than another?</strong> (material used and modifications taken place)</p><p> </p><p>Besides what the stock is made from that makes it more accurate, besides free-floating, <strong>when is glass</strong></p><p><strong>bedding ok instead of pillar bedding?</strong></p><p> </p><p>I'm more referring to factory stocks, but all stocks can be included. And again, before anyone adds</p><p>"Get a McMillan" or "Get a Bell & Carlson", H S Precision, etc, I'm mainly interested in talking the</p><p>inherent accuracy found in some stocks over another based on the material used and the modifications</p><p>one does to improve the accuracy.</p><p> </p><p>I have factory stocks on some of my guns and am considering either free-floating and bedding them,</p><p>or getting a "M" or "B&C" stock and be done with it. LOL! But I really would like to learn something</p><p>here as well.</p><p> </p><p>Thanks,</p><p> </p><p>iSnipe</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iSnipe, post: 334737, member: 13596"] Instead of me listing what I know, or think I know about accuracy issues, pro or con, about certain stocks, I'll just leave it open to all replies. I should leave laminate stocks out of this because I have no interest in them. Since it does fit in the with the line of questioning, if you want to respond to that, it's ok. [B]Is one kind of stock more inherently accurate than another?[/B] I'm talking what it is made from. [B]If said stock is more accurate, why?[/B] [B]What makes one stock more accurate than another?[/B] (material used and modifications taken place) Besides what the stock is made from that makes it more accurate, besides free-floating, [B]when is glass[/B] [B]bedding ok instead of pillar bedding?[/B] I'm more referring to factory stocks, but all stocks can be included. And again, before anyone adds "Get a McMillan" or "Get a Bell & Carlson", H S Precision, etc, I'm mainly interested in talking the inherent accuracy found in some stocks over another based on the material used and the modifications one does to improve the accuracy. I have factory stocks on some of my guns and am considering either free-floating and bedding them, or getting a "M" or "B&C" stock and be done with it. LOL! But I really would like to learn something here as well. Thanks, iSnipe [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Accuracy: Wood vs Synthetic vs Laminate
Top