Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Accuracy Project For Science Fair
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 872401" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>I just don't think you've thought this through...</p><p>Ballistics is one of the more complicated of science. </p><p>To separate from pure abstract, you're gonna have to focus this with a mountain of qualifiers needed to form a point you could hang a hat on..</p><p>For instance velocity and accuracy,, two separate things,, one too many already.</p><p></p><p>Only a truth passes all tests</p><p>If you don't address every single attribute of results, and I doubt you can, your 'truth' will be challenged immediately.</p><p>For example, if you declare reloads more accurate, then which combination of load components, and gun components, was more accurate than every factory ammo offering available, in every gun?</p><p>The best you could do is say XX load combination(to the lot#s) was found to be more accurate(don't forget to define accuracy) than YY factory ammo, in this gun, preconditioned BB way, under ZZ conditions, at GG distance, for JJ shots, etc</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 872401, member: 1521"] I just don't think you've thought this through... Ballistics is one of the more complicated of science. To separate from pure abstract, you're gonna have to focus this with a mountain of qualifiers needed to form a point you could hang a hat on.. For instance velocity and accuracy,, two separate things,, one too many already. Only a truth passes all tests If you don't address every single attribute of results, and I doubt you can, your 'truth' will be challenged immediately. For example, if you declare reloads more accurate, then which combination of load components, and gun components, was more accurate than every factory ammo offering available, in every gun? The best you could do is say XX load combination(to the lot#s) was found to be more accurate(don't forget to define accuracy) than YY factory ammo, in this gun, preconditioned BB way, under ZZ conditions, at GG distance, for JJ shots, etc [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Accuracy Project For Science Fair
Top