Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Accubond failures?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nomosendero" data-source="post: 2312707" data-attributes="member: 3622"><p>This is an old thread and some back then called them Accubombs. I don't pay attention to most gun writers but one that I think actually knows what he writes about is John Barsness. He states that the Accubond started out considerably softer and Nosler changed that. The same applies to the non-bonded Bal. Tip. I think some of those are on their third generation now. They are still expanders but tougher than they used to be, my own experience bears that out. My Accubond experience is only with the newer ones and they have done well!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nomosendero, post: 2312707, member: 3622"] This is an old thread and some back then called them Accubombs. I don't pay attention to most gun writers but one that I think actually knows what he writes about is John Barsness. He states that the Accubond started out considerably softer and Nosler changed that. The same applies to the non-bonded Bal. Tip. I think some of those are on their third generation now. They are still expanders but tougher than they used to be, my own experience bears that out. My Accubond experience is only with the newer ones and they have done well! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Accubond failures?
Top