Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7prc > 7rm ??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 3080801" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>Belts are an anachronism that ultimately wastes chamber space by limiting the diameter of the case above the belt. There's no point to using the 375 H&H as a parent case over the 404 Jeffrey today, support of older cartridges is the only reason it persists.</p><p></p><p>There's nothing inherently "better" about having a belt vs not having one. It's nothing more than Winchester's and Remington's marketing machine from the 1960s competing against Hornady's marketing machine today. Whatever BS the Fudds swallowed back then is no different from the BS being fed to the weak minded today. They just bit on it back then and refuse to admit it today.</p><p></p><p>That said you can solve the case head separation issue you're having with Peterson long brass if you don't want to buy a new barrel.</p><p></p><p>If you want to buy a new barrel, skip the Rem Mag and the PRC and go for a 28 Nosler or 7 RUM or something else unreasonable that makes Fudds sad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 3080801, member: 116181"] Belts are an anachronism that ultimately wastes chamber space by limiting the diameter of the case above the belt. There's no point to using the 375 H&H as a parent case over the 404 Jeffrey today, support of older cartridges is the only reason it persists. There's nothing inherently "better" about having a belt vs not having one. It's nothing more than Winchester's and Remington's marketing machine from the 1960s competing against Hornady's marketing machine today. Whatever BS the Fudds swallowed back then is no different from the BS being fed to the weak minded today. They just bit on it back then and refuse to admit it today. That said you can solve the case head separation issue you're having with Peterson long brass if you don't want to buy a new barrel. If you want to buy a new barrel, skip the Rem Mag and the PRC and go for a 28 Nosler or 7 RUM or something else unreasonable that makes Fudds sad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7prc > 7rm ??
Top