Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm-300 Win Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 613843" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>Long Range, you are asking the wrong guy about little bullets, I gave them up long ago. But I think you would be fine as long as you didn't exceed the bullets capabilities as far as twist and velocity are concerned. </p><p> </p><p>I had PTG do my last reamer and it is awesome. They kinda screwed up a bit and gave it .050" more throat length than I requested but in the end it was perfect as the rifle likes the bullet .050" off the lands and was a consistant .2 and .3 MOA rifle at 300 yards. Now I am thinking the extra .050" will play right into the new 195's length. </p><p> </p><p>My reamer is a no turn neck, I have had zero issues with necking down to 7mm and the neck thickness.</p><p> </p><p>I will admit that I lost a little fire for the round with the introduction of the 230 Bergers for the 300 win. But now with this new 195 and the proposed BC's I am thinking the 7mm-300 just grabbed another gear.</p><p> </p><p>The way the 180's shoot I can't wait to try some of the 195's. My buddy took a porcupine at close to 1100 yards in some light wind with his. </p><p> </p><p>ps: I HIGHLY recommend a hart tube. The Harts have 6 lands and it induces less stress on jackets. </p><p> </p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 613843, member: 7503"] Long Range, you are asking the wrong guy about little bullets, I gave them up long ago. But I think you would be fine as long as you didn't exceed the bullets capabilities as far as twist and velocity are concerned. I had PTG do my last reamer and it is awesome. They kinda screwed up a bit and gave it .050" more throat length than I requested but in the end it was perfect as the rifle likes the bullet .050" off the lands and was a consistant .2 and .3 MOA rifle at 300 yards. Now I am thinking the extra .050" will play right into the new 195's length. My reamer is a no turn neck, I have had zero issues with necking down to 7mm and the neck thickness. I will admit that I lost a little fire for the round with the introduction of the 230 Bergers for the 300 win. But now with this new 195 and the proposed BC's I am thinking the 7mm-300 just grabbed another gear. The way the 180's shoot I can't wait to try some of the 195's. My buddy took a porcupine at close to 1100 yards in some light wind with his. ps: I HIGHLY recommend a hart tube. The Harts have 6 lands and it induces less stress on jackets. Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm-300 Win Mag
Top