7 mag vs 300 wsm

Discussion in 'The Basics, Starting Out' started by awesfall, Jun 26, 2009.

  1. awesfall

    awesfall Member

    Messages:
    15
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    which gun is better out of the two for flat , fast and acurate. and knock down power
     
  2. novaman64

    novaman64 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    313
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    I think it depends on use. No offense, but if one round was far superior to another, the less superior round wouldnt be manufactured anymore.
     

  3. Seven Oaks

    Seven Oaks Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    62
    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    They both are accurate, both are flat shooters, both deliver excellent down range performance on game. The mag capacity is 3 on both rifles.

    The 7MM uses bullets that have a little Higher BC. The 300WSM offers a hunting bullet selection above 175 grains. The 7 Mag does not.

    The real distinction between the 2 cartridges are the rifle designs for each. The WSM is built on a short action, usually comes with a 23 or 24" bbl. and is a shorter, lighter rifle. It also headspaces off of the shoulder.

    The 7MM Mag. is built on a magnum length action, usually has a 26" barrel, headspaces off of a belt above the head of the cartridge case. and is heavier and longer.

    Both are great cartridges, both have excellent bullet selections to choose from.

    Hope this helps.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2009
  4. J E Custom

    J E Custom Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    7,312
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    +1

    The best comparison is the 7 mm mag to the 7 WSM they are ballistic equals.

    The 7 WSM would fit in a short action just like the 300 WSM and the same 7mm ballistics apply.

    With the shorter round you effectively get a little longer barrel bore for the same size overall
    length.

    J E CUSTOM
     
  5. Long Time Long Ranger

    Long Time Long Ranger Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,612
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    I agree with all this is splitting hairs. But if I had to choose one rifle to hunt everything with, between the two it would be the 300 wsm. It can get tremendous velocity out of a shorter lighter barreld rifle. The 7mm rem mag needs barrel length adding weight. My 300 wsm has a 24 1/2" barrel and shoots a 150 grain nosler Etip with a .469 BC at 3419 fps and a 200 grain accubond at 2900 fps with a .588 or whatever BC. At short or long range I think this eclipses what a 7mm rem mag will do and it does it in a shorter, lighter rifle. Somebody look it up on your ballistics program and see what they look like side by side. It would be interesting. Will either one kill stuff? yes.
     
  6. baldhunter

    baldhunter Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    446
    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    I've got both and both are great shooting rifles.As far as accuracy goes,I find both to be equal too.To me they are kinda like twins.What loads work good for my 7mag in 140-150gr bullets,are very close to,or the same in the 300WSM with 165gr bullets.The slight edge may go to the 300WSM because of the larger dia. and heavier bullet weights,guess it really depends on what you're using it for.For me it's a toss up,I like them both.
     
  7. MontanaRifleman

    MontanaRifleman Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,068
    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    I also have both cartridges and they both have about the same effective range, the 300 WSM maybe a little farther... with RL17 it can launch a 180 bullet @ 3200 fps which is about 100-200 faster than a 7RM can launch a 160 gr bullet of about the same BC. I pick the 300 WSM 7RM for hunting, although both are very good. The 300 WSM makes a bigger hole and delivers a bigger payload down range.

    -MR
     
  8. Wookie316

    Wookie316 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    145
    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    I'm a 7mm guy, but there is nothing wrong with a 300 WSM either.

    Cheers