Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
6.5PRC Reloading Data Collection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="can1010" data-source="post: 2224924" data-attributes="member: 43193"><p>I have had better luck with faster powders with bullets lighter than 140 class. RL-16, H4350 have been more consistent and cleaner burning than the slower powders with less fouling and carbon ring problems. the 120 B-TIP and the 130 AB both worked well with 51-57gr of RL-16 and a 2.850 OAL. the slower powders were always compressed and didn't burn clean the faster powders avoided compressed and both those powders are very stable in temp swings, RL-16 also has the de coppering agents which is always a plus</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="can1010, post: 2224924, member: 43193"] I have had better luck with faster powders with bullets lighter than 140 class. RL-16, H4350 have been more consistent and cleaner burning than the slower powders with less fouling and carbon ring problems. the 120 B-TIP and the 130 AB both worked well with 51-57gr of RL-16 and a 2.850 OAL. the slower powders were always compressed and didn't burn clean the faster powders avoided compressed and both those powders are very stable in temp swings, RL-16 also has the de coppering agents which is always a plus [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
6.5PRC Reloading Data Collection
Top