Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
6.5mm copper monos for Elk - LRX vs CX vs E-tip vs CEB vs Hammer vs Lehigh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HARPERC" data-source="post: 3003953" data-attributes="member: 30671"><p>Some of us prefer an Sg of 2 for terminal performance. </p><p></p><p>The 1.5 aids in keeping bullet point on at impact, which in turn aids in expansion as advertised, and a longer wound channel due to maintaining a straighter line. </p><p></p><p>In my experience absent measuring twist rates are often mis stated. I'd start with the 118 HHT.</p><p></p><p>I prefer the nose coming off, over a classic mushroom. You will see more penetration, and keeping the velocity higher through the animal typically better wound channels.</p><p></p><p>Best wishes</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HARPERC, post: 3003953, member: 30671"] Some of us prefer an Sg of 2 for terminal performance. The 1.5 aids in keeping bullet point on at impact, which in turn aids in expansion as advertised, and a longer wound channel due to maintaining a straighter line. In my experience absent measuring twist rates are often mis stated. I'd start with the 118 HHT. I prefer the nose coming off, over a classic mushroom. You will see more penetration, and keeping the velocity higher through the animal typically better wound channels. Best wishes [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
6.5mm copper monos for Elk - LRX vs CX vs E-tip vs CEB vs Hammer vs Lehigh
Top