Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 sherman q&a
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkaholic" data-source="post: 905897" data-attributes="member: 13833"><p>I have not used the Cauterucio, so can't speak to them. I agree that the Bergers work quite well, but have reservations about using them in a 6.5 at ranges where you don't have 2100-2200' impact velocity. At that range, I believe the A-max is superior. I agree with Cliff as to the toughness of the Matrix. With that kind of sectional density, I would not be afraid to shoot elk, and even moose with this bullet. (even at high velocity)</p><p>I think when we talk about an "all around bullet", we have to know what the all around is? If I were choosing one with larger game like elk and moose in mind, it would definitely be the Matrix 160. I do want to do some more testing at long range with them before I make a firm decision on there expansion capabilities on game. I think it is a good idea to anneal the tips, as was described in an earlier thread, to promote easier expansion. With the toughness and sectional density of this bullet, I don't think there is a problem with TOO MUCH expansion at closer ranges. The Matrix will likely be my go to bullet as well.</p><p></p><p>I would also consider the 142 Matrix for some testing as well. So far, I have only used them on paper where they are very accurate! I would EXPECT that they would act much like the Berger on game, although they might be a bit tougher to expand because they aren't quite as aggressive on the ogive, but this is just speculation. Again, I would have to test them out. So much testing, so little time!.......Rich</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkaholic, post: 905897, member: 13833"] I have not used the Cauterucio, so can't speak to them. I agree that the Bergers work quite well, but have reservations about using them in a 6.5 at ranges where you don't have 2100-2200' impact velocity. At that range, I believe the A-max is superior. I agree with Cliff as to the toughness of the Matrix. With that kind of sectional density, I would not be afraid to shoot elk, and even moose with this bullet. (even at high velocity) I think when we talk about an "all around bullet", we have to know what the all around is? If I were choosing one with larger game like elk and moose in mind, it would definitely be the Matrix 160. I do want to do some more testing at long range with them before I make a firm decision on there expansion capabilities on game. I think it is a good idea to anneal the tips, as was described in an earlier thread, to promote easier expansion. With the toughness and sectional density of this bullet, I don't think there is a problem with TOO MUCH expansion at closer ranges. The Matrix will likely be my go to bullet as well. I would also consider the 142 Matrix for some testing as well. So far, I have only used them on paper where they are very accurate! I would EXPECT that they would act much like the Berger on game, although they might be a bit tougher to expand because they aren't quite as aggressive on the ogive, but this is just speculation. Again, I would have to test them out. So much testing, so little time!.......Rich [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 sherman q&a
Top