Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
375 RUM and the 260 Accubond...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kennibear" data-source="post: 885611" data-attributes="member: 51650"><p>VihtaVuorri N560 vs. IMR4831</p><p></p><p>Just did a comparison of VihtaVuorri's N560 and some similar common place powders and in 300 WinMag and 338 WinMag n560 and IMR 4831 use very similar charge rates. The N560 seems to be able to use very slightly higher charges in some cases. So my best guess is that if you know a safe load with IMR 4831 then that is a reasonable top load for N560.</p><p></p><p>Compared data in both Sierra's 5th Edition and Lapua's online data. Sierra is using less for its top loads that Lapua lists as top, apples for apples.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kennibear, post: 885611, member: 51650"] VihtaVuorri N560 vs. IMR4831 Just did a comparison of VihtaVuorri's N560 and some similar common place powders and in 300 WinMag and 338 WinMag n560 and IMR 4831 use very similar charge rates. The N560 seems to be able to use very slightly higher charges in some cases. So my best guess is that if you know a safe load with IMR 4831 then that is a reasonable top load for N560. Compared data in both Sierra's 5th Edition and Lapua's online data. Sierra is using less for its top loads that Lapua lists as top, apples for apples. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
375 RUM and the 260 Accubond...
Top