Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.375 Ruger, musings on use in LRH (long winded)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="comfisherman" data-source="post: 496001" data-attributes="member: 8394"><p>wow, thanks for the info on the 260 accubond, ill be doing up a batch and that gives me an idea. I think this thread should read, "comprehensive musings and load data for a 375ruger". an accubond at 2900 would be awesome but definitely not doable with my stubbylittle tube.</p><p></p><p>Hogdon lists 83.5 as a 60,000lbs load for 4350, so even 84-86 of rl 17 seems plausible, I'm wondering how cmpressed a load it was. From what I know of rl 17, and honestly what ive found with the wsm vs winmag cartridges is that pressure gives no sign and then it rears its head in a big way. I don't know if the short stubby cartridges mask it better or what, rl 17 certainly spikes outta no where. </p><p></p><p>I will say this your data has me excited for the 260 bonds, and the tipped 250 tsx</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="comfisherman, post: 496001, member: 8394"] wow, thanks for the info on the 260 accubond, ill be doing up a batch and that gives me an idea. I think this thread should read, "comprehensive musings and load data for a 375ruger". an accubond at 2900 would be awesome but definitely not doable with my stubbylittle tube. Hogdon lists 83.5 as a 60,000lbs load for 4350, so even 84-86 of rl 17 seems plausible, I'm wondering how cmpressed a load it was. From what I know of rl 17, and honestly what ive found with the wsm vs winmag cartridges is that pressure gives no sign and then it rears its head in a big way. I don't know if the short stubby cartridges mask it better or what, rl 17 certainly spikes outta no where. I will say this your data has me excited for the 260 bonds, and the tipped 250 tsx [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.375 Ruger, musings on use in LRH (long winded)
Top