Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 RUM... What would YOU do?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D.ID" data-source="post: 636838" data-attributes="member: 14340"><p>OK JE......I apparently need some schooling, so enlighten me if you would. Why would you say there is no reason to use the full sized slugs? Nothing is flat at a thousand yards and do to the rapid velocity bleeding of lower bc bullets the extra initial speed will be long gone at 1100 windage and terminal velocity at impact will swing negative for the lighter pills. What would be gained by the lighter bullets? Not tying to be argumentative just tying to understand the philosophy behind that statement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D.ID, post: 636838, member: 14340"] OK JE......I apparently need some schooling, so enlighten me if you would. Why would you say there is no reason to use the full sized slugs? Nothing is flat at a thousand yards and do to the rapid velocity bleeding of lower bc bullets the extra initial speed will be long gone at 1100 windage and terminal velocity at impact will swing negative for the lighter pills. What would be gained by the lighter bullets? Not tying to be argumentative just tying to understand the philosophy behind that statement. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 RUM... What would YOU do?
Top