Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 Remington Ultra Mag load data desired
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wapiti1gw" data-source="post: 407661" data-attributes="member: 25850"><p>Who says Ruger #1's aren't accurate? I had my #1 338 win. mag. re-chambered to 338 RUM and consistantly print under 3/4 inch groups with a 200 gr. Nosler Accu-Bond and 96 gr. of 7828. And I get 3280 f.p.s. over a pro-chrony. At 2" high at 100 yds. this gives me a no hold over on Elk out to almost 400 yds. But, even in the heavy #1 I found that a good brake made it a lot more shooter friendly. 7828 was significantly faster than either rl-25 or h-1000. Give it a try. Gerry Wood Cody, Wyoming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wapiti1gw, post: 407661, member: 25850"] Who says Ruger #1's aren't accurate? I had my #1 338 win. mag. re-chambered to 338 RUM and consistantly print under 3/4 inch groups with a 200 gr. Nosler Accu-Bond and 96 gr. of 7828. And I get 3280 f.p.s. over a pro-chrony. At 2" high at 100 yds. this gives me a no hold over on Elk out to almost 400 yds. But, even in the heavy #1 I found that a good brake made it a lot more shooter friendly. 7828 was significantly faster than either rl-25 or h-1000. Give it a try. Gerry Wood Cody, Wyoming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 Remington Ultra Mag load data desired
Top