Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
338 EDGE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="davewilson" data-source="post: 105138" data-attributes="member: 4491"><p>Shawn, you mention separating by base to ogive brought your ES down. i understand that's appropriate for long range consistancy, but for bringing down the ES i would think separating by bearing surface length would have more to do with ES.evidently the base to ogive must be consistent with the bearing surface.kinda off the subject,but which do you think is more important for long range accuracy? most long range shooters back here think bearing surface but my feelings are base to ogive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="davewilson, post: 105138, member: 4491"] Shawn, you mention separating by base to ogive brought your ES down. i understand that's appropriate for long range consistancy, but for bringing down the ES i would think separating by bearing surface length would have more to do with ES.evidently the base to ogive must be consistent with the bearing surface.kinda off the subject,but which do you think is more important for long range accuracy? most long range shooters back here think bearing surface but my feelings are base to ogive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
338 EDGE
Top