Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
338 edge v.s 338 lapua
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SavageShtr" data-source="post: 547483" data-attributes="member: 15118"><p><span style="font-family: 'Calibri'"><span style="font-size: 12px">B23 I did state I was getting 2999fps with the load of 95.0gr of RL-25. Again it is out of a 32" 1-10 twist barrel on a savage target action. And it is not at 110% case capacity, it is not even a compressed load. The COAL is 2.881" to the o-give. I would love to shoot it over other chronographs but I don't have that luxury I have two and they are both shooting chrony's and they read the same. I only used the 2870fps I was getting with my H-1000 load to show that my chronograph is consistent. I do plan to shoot the RL-25 load again over the chronograph this weekend to triple check the numbers. I did plug the numbers into my ballistic calculator and it matched the real world results I was getting in the field. This load was .75 moa higher than the H-1000 load I was testing the same day at 300 yards. Have you used this powder and load in your rifle or do you just go around and pretend you know everything. All I can say is that I don't get a stiff bolt lift or any ejector marks with this load. I am going to leave it at that. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SavageShtr, post: 547483, member: 15118"] [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]B23 I did state I was getting 2999fps with the load of 95.0gr of RL-25. Again it is out of a 32” 1-10 twist barrel on a savage target action. And it is not at 110% case capacity, it is not even a compressed load. The COAL is 2.881” to the o-give. I would love to shoot it over other chronographs but I don’t have that luxury I have two and they are both shooting chrony’s and they read the same. I only used the 2870fps I was getting with my H-1000 load to show that my chronograph is consistent. I do plan to shoot the RL-25 load again over the chronograph this weekend to triple check the numbers. I did plug the numbers into my ballistic calculator and it matched the real world results I was getting in the field. This load was .75 moa higher than the H-1000 load I was testing the same day at 300 yards. Have you used this powder and load in your rifle or do you just go around and pretend you know everything. All I can say is that I don’t get a stiff bolt lift or any ejector marks with this load. I am going to leave it at that. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
338 edge v.s 338 lapua
Top