Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.338 cal BC comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bjlooper" data-source="post: 139962" data-attributes="member: 5547"><p>After a year on this forum I'm convinced that slow high BC bullets out perform fast low BC bullets at long ranges. I have been wondering at what distance the slow bullets catches up the faster ones. I don't have a ballistic calculator I was wondering if anyone has a comparison of the .338 RUM or .338 edge loaded with 225gr, 250gr, and 300gr. bullets.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the help</p><p>DR B</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bjlooper, post: 139962, member: 5547"] After a year on this forum I’m convinced that slow high BC bullets out perform fast low BC bullets at long ranges. I have been wondering at what distance the slow bullets catches up the faster ones. I don’t have a ballistic calculator I was wondering if anyone has a comparison of the .338 RUM or .338 edge loaded with 225gr, 250gr, and 300gr. bullets. Thanks for the help DR B [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.338 cal BC comparison
Top