Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 300 grain SMK test results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jeffbird" data-source="post: 165118" data-attributes="member: 4916"><p>So, if the 225 Accubond and 300 SMK both resulted in about the same terminal performance, why not shoot the lighter bullet and save the pounding on the body? I seem to remember you obtained a good result in actual field application with the Abond last year. Any comparative results for the 265 Wildcat?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jeffbird, post: 165118, member: 4916"] So, if the 225 Accubond and 300 SMK both resulted in about the same terminal performance, why not shoot the lighter bullet and save the pounding on the body? I seem to remember you obtained a good result in actual field application with the Abond last year. Any comparative results for the 265 Wildcat? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 300 grain SMK test results
Top