Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300WSM 200gr Accubond controversy ??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ballistic64" data-source="post: 92169" data-attributes="member: 3401"><p>I had asked the same question with the 300 SAUM,the response from the moderator was using 200 gr bullets in these short mags takes up to much powder space and defeats the purpose.I mentioned having the chamber throated to this size bullet and was reminded that it would effectively become a single shot (which I dont mind) because of the magazine length restriction.Im just interested in playing around with the short mag to see how it performs in a sendero based gun.Anyone else done any long range with any of the short mags?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ballistic64, post: 92169, member: 3401"] I had asked the same question with the 300 SAUM,the response from the moderator was using 200 gr bullets in these short mags takes up to much powder space and defeats the purpose.I mentioned having the chamber throated to this size bullet and was reminded that it would effectively become a single shot (which I dont mind) because of the magazine length restriction.Im just interested in playing around with the short mag to see how it performs in a sendero based gun.Anyone else done any long range with any of the short mags? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300WSM 200gr Accubond controversy ??
Top