Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.300 Weatherby vs .300 RUM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="30 Caliber Mag Fan" data-source="post: 59267" data-attributes="member: 2166"><p>Jeff-</p><p></p><p>I did a lot of testing and load development with .300 Weatherby. I worked up a load that is pushing a 150 grain bullet at 3620 fps. Granted, I can only get 3-4 loading per round of brass from this load but I am hard pressed to find loadings of .300 RUM that greatly exceed this performance. Thus the performance gap between the .300 Weatherby and .300 RUM does not seem to be that great. </p><p></p><p>Hopefully, my original statement makes a bit more sense and I should have put more context into my original post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="30 Caliber Mag Fan, post: 59267, member: 2166"] Jeff- I did a lot of testing and load development with .300 Weatherby. I worked up a load that is pushing a 150 grain bullet at 3620 fps. Granted, I can only get 3-4 loading per round of brass from this load but I am hard pressed to find loadings of .300 RUM that greatly exceed this performance. Thus the performance gap between the .300 Weatherby and .300 RUM does not seem to be that great. Hopefully, my original statement makes a bit more sense and I should have put more context into my original post. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.300 Weatherby vs .300 RUM
Top