Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300 Wby. Mag. VS. 300 Rem.Ultra Mag. ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="asd9055" data-source="post: 3086329" data-attributes="member: 73445"><p>I don't have a 300RUM. I have a few 300WBY. All extremely accurate.</p><p>300RUM is faster than 300 WBY, not bad for something that came about 60 years later. Then again, why not compare it to the 30-378WBY, made originally long before the RUM, like 1959.</p><p>People complaint about the freebore , yet the latest move Is for +P chambers, which is more freebore</p><p>Also people</p><p>Complaint about the double radius yet nobody can explain why they is something wrong.</p><p>If you gave me a RUM I am sure I will enjoy it. I do enjoy my WBY and every other rifle I have</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="asd9055, post: 3086329, member: 73445"] I don't have a 300RUM. I have a few 300WBY. All extremely accurate. 300RUM is faster than 300 WBY, not bad for something that came about 60 years later. Then again, why not compare it to the 30-378WBY, made originally long before the RUM, like 1959. People complaint about the freebore , yet the latest move Is for +P chambers, which is more freebore Also people Complaint about the double radius yet nobody can explain why they is something wrong. If you gave me a RUM I am sure I will enjoy it. I do enjoy my WBY and every other rifle I have [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300 Wby. Mag. VS. 300 Rem.Ultra Mag. ?
Top