Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
.300 Ultra Mag vs. 7mm Ultra Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="remingtonman_25_06" data-source="post: 100361" data-attributes="member: 1403"><p>One of us shooting the ULD's should shoot them into wet newspaper. Thats how I usually test my bullets expantion, penetration, weight retention. I never did get a chance to shoot my 125g uld rbbt's into newspaper. I wished I would have though to see how they stackd up to the others. I found that the 200g and 220g smk's give mixed results. Out of 3 fired into wet nespaper at 100 yards, 1 expanded, but it was seperated from the jacket and the lead core fell out, the other 2 bullets simply bent and misformed a little. They do penetrate quite a bit though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="remingtonman_25_06, post: 100361, member: 1403"] One of us shooting the ULD's should shoot them into wet newspaper. Thats how I usually test my bullets expantion, penetration, weight retention. I never did get a chance to shoot my 125g uld rbbt's into newspaper. I wished I would have though to see how they stackd up to the others. I found that the 200g and 220g smk's give mixed results. Out of 3 fired into wet nespaper at 100 yards, 1 expanded, but it was seperated from the jacket and the lead core fell out, the other 2 bullets simply bent and misformed a little. They do penetrate quite a bit though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
The Basics, Starting Out
.300 Ultra Mag vs. 7mm Ultra Mag
Top