300 SMK VS 300 Lapua Scenar

Discussion in 'Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics' started by Chas1, Jan 10, 2010.

  1. Chas1

    Chas1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,547
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Sierra list the 300 SMK BC @ .768 and Lapua list the 300 Scenar @ .785 In addition the Sierra meplats are more often non-uniformed than the Scenar. While they are more expensive...they are more readily available. Just curious why I'm always hearing about the 300 SMK and by comparison rarely the 300 Scenar...Is it price or ??? Any thoughts or personal experience anyone wantys to share. ps-I'm a fan of 300 SMK's so please no pee pee contest...they're both excellent bullets. I'm just looking for input.
     
  2. Tyler Kemp

    Tyler Kemp SPONSOR

    Messages:
    1,461
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    I don't think the Scenars expand, so they wouldn't be good for hunting with.
     

  3. Michael Eichele

    Michael Eichele Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,829
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Neither the SMK or the Scenar are designed to expand. However it is widely known that even though the 300 grain SMK wasnt designed for it, it does with alot more predictablity than other SMK sizes. I personally have not been able to get a Scenar to expand whatsoever in test mediums. I have yet to talk with anybody who has be it on a test medium or game. Its a shame since my 338 Edge shoots the SMK well but the Scenar exceptionally well.
     
  4. canyonman1

    canyonman1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    81
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2009
    I shoot the Lapua for everything but game. I use the sierra for killing. In my 338 edge, the Lapua is more consistant from 1,000 yds. out to 1,500, and beyond. I like the nose profile better and the trimmed meplats and point forming die they use I think makes the difference. Besides it looks more accurate and to my way of thinking adds confidence when the tips are uniform, not jagged like the sierra. Also, the doppler radar figures on lapua's web site list the B.C @ .825. Sierra is .768.
    Not to hijack your thread or change the topic, but I've been shooting the Hornady 250 g. BTHP match for a couple hundred rounds at 1,425 yds. and they are really consistant also. B.C. is .675gun)
     
  5. Chas1

    Chas1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,547
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Of these 2, then is it fair to say that for hunting=300SMK and for paper=300 Scenar?
     
  6. royinidaho

    royinidaho Writers Guild

    Messages:
    8,853
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
  7. Chas1

    Chas1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,547
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Thanks for sharing, a good read.
     
  8. jcathunter

    jcathunter Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    51
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    I know its an old thread but I thougth I'd add my person experience with 250gr scenars.
    542yds and he didn't travel
    [​IMG]
    exit wound from just under 400yds DRT
    [​IMG]
    shot angled back a bit. exit wound from just under 400yds
    [​IMG]
    100yds. Had to track this one a LONG ways. lol
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Chas1

    Chas1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,547
    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    250 gr scenar seemed to do the trick.