Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 RUM vs 338 RUM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fiftydriver" data-source="post: 503924" data-attributes="member: 10"><p>Ya, any barrel that is not clearly stamped for twist rate would be a bit suspect in my opinion as well. The 175s would likely be a bit big for the WSM class cases anyway and probably would not be any benefit over the 165 because of its velocity edge over the expected useful range of the WSM chambering. Not sure you would see much better results then you already are with the 165.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fiftydriver, post: 503924, member: 10"] Ya, any barrel that is not clearly stamped for twist rate would be a bit suspect in my opinion as well. The 175s would likely be a bit big for the WSM class cases anyway and probably would not be any benefit over the 165 because of its velocity edge over the expected useful range of the WSM chambering. Not sure you would see much better results then you already are with the 165. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 RUM vs 338 RUM
Top