Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 RUM vs 338 RUM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigngreen" data-source="post: 503625" data-attributes="member: 13632"><p>Kinda thought the same thing. The ballistics on my 270 WSM with 165's are better than a 300 RUM with a 180 TSX.</p><p></p><p>The reason for debating RUM's vs the Lapua is the ballistics are so close that for me it comes down to what is the most practical to build on a standard long action, the RUM wins that. If I were building on a custom action then I would step up to the Lapua improved of some kind to make a real performance jump.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigngreen, post: 503625, member: 13632"] Kinda thought the same thing. The ballistics on my 270 WSM with 165's are better than a 300 RUM with a 180 TSX. The reason for debating RUM's vs the Lapua is the ballistics are so close that for me it comes down to what is the most practical to build on a standard long action, the RUM wins that. If I were building on a custom action then I would step up to the Lapua improved of some kind to make a real performance jump. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 RUM vs 338 RUM
Top