Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 RUM: 180 vs 200 gr Accubond
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AZShooter" data-source="post: 989016" data-attributes="member: 5219"><p>I got the 200 gr accubond to go 3175 with a 27" lilja using RL-25. Shot several elk with it and only found one bullet in an animal which was a diagonal body shot traversing at least 25" at 560 yds. If I were to again use the 30 cal accubond it would be the 200 grainer. </p><p></p><p> I switched to the 230 gr Berger because the issue with the longer shots was wind drift. Even at the lower velocity of 2975 fps the Berger superior in drift and retained energy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AZShooter, post: 989016, member: 5219"] I got the 200 gr accubond to go 3175 with a 27" lilja using RL-25. Shot several elk with it and only found one bullet in an animal which was a diagonal body shot traversing at least 25" at 560 yds. If I were to again use the 30 cal accubond it would be the 200 grainer. I switched to the 230 gr Berger because the issue with the longer shots was wind drift. Even at the lower velocity of 2975 fps the Berger superior in drift and retained energy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 RUM: 180 vs 200 gr Accubond
Top