Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
280AI question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woods" data-source="post: 489459" data-attributes="member: 6042"><p>Hey eddy</p><p></p><p>According to this SAAMI page</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.saami.org/PubResources/CC_Drawings/C%20and%20C%20Dwgs%20-%20TOC%20-%20Rifle.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.saami.org/PubResources/CC_Drawings/C and C Dwgs - TOC - Rifle.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>the 280 remington drawing date was 6/20/86 and the 280 Ackley Improved was 4/10/08</p><p></p><p>So I don't think that changes in the 280 rem specs has anything to do with this. Now on another forum someone mentioned that the reason was because of variances in the Remington factory load 280 remington caliber brass was as much as .007" in the dimension from case head to neck/shoulder. If this is the case then 50 years went down the tube because of Remington poor quality control.</p><p></p><p>Why doesn't that surprise me?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woods, post: 489459, member: 6042"] Hey eddy According to this SAAMI page [url]http://www.saami.org/PubResources/CC_Drawings/C%20and%20C%20Dwgs%20-%20TOC%20-%20Rifle.pdf[/url] the 280 remington drawing date was 6/20/86 and the 280 Ackley Improved was 4/10/08 So I don't think that changes in the 280 rem specs has anything to do with this. Now on another forum someone mentioned that the reason was because of variances in the Remington factory load 280 remington caliber brass was as much as .007" in the dimension from case head to neck/shoulder. If this is the case then 50 years went down the tube because of Remington poor quality control. Why doesn't that surprise me? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
280AI question
Top