Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
280 Remington, why not?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cfvickers" data-source="post: 496162" data-attributes="member: 25488"><p>I must say that I don't understand any better than you do why 3.34 inches OAL is not conducive to long range shooting. Were they joking?? Go measure a few factory .300 Win Mag rounds. It was purpose built in the 60s to be a long range cartridge. and it is an accurate cartridge as well. True, most will load their heavier bullets longer when reloading, but if you load ammo for your .280 you probably will too. I wouldn't worry about what some people say, just be judicious about who you believe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cfvickers, post: 496162, member: 25488"] I must say that I don't understand any better than you do why 3.34 inches OAL is not conducive to long range shooting. Were they joking?? Go measure a few factory .300 Win Mag rounds. It was purpose built in the 60s to be a long range cartridge. and it is an accurate cartridge as well. True, most will load their heavier bullets longer when reloading, but if you load ammo for your .280 you probably will too. I wouldn't worry about what some people say, just be judicious about who you believe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
280 Remington, why not?
Top