Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FEENIX" data-source="post: 836153" data-attributes="member: 14204"><p>Now, this thread has officially turned to <strong>bullchip</strong>, <strong>you started to set the tone and definitely ended it with STFU</strong> ... thanks to you. </p><p></p><p>The originally intent of my post is a positive exchange of information (as JE has clearly noted that is what this website is all about) but you simply responded bullchip!</p><p></p><p>I totally agree about sharing personal experiences, the difference however is that, others didn't get defensive and remained civil about it.</p><p></p><p>TOM H simply commented, he thought you had chamber problem and was wondering why you're blaming it on Nosler AI brass, what's wrong with simply answering him directly, instead you took offense to it. </p><p></p><p>Let's see, you introduced a math problem and now politics that has no bearing other than to skew the information and redirect the issue(s) at hand, that too is a typical liberal MO. lightbulb</p><p><img src="http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f258/lara3ec/images-2.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> <span style="font-size: 26px"><strong>out!</strong></span></p><p>... and God bless!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FEENIX, post: 836153, member: 14204"] Now, this thread has officially turned to [B]bullchip[/B], [B]you started to set the tone and definitely ended it with STFU[/B] ... thanks to you. The originally intent of my post is a positive exchange of information (as JE has clearly noted that is what this website is all about) but you simply responded bullchip! I totally agree about sharing personal experiences, the difference however is that, others didn't get defensive and remained civil about it. TOM H simply commented, he thought you had chamber problem and was wondering why you're blaming it on Nosler AI brass, what's wrong with simply answering him directly, instead you took offense to it. Let's see, you introduced a math problem and now politics that has no bearing other than to skew the information and redirect the issue(s) at hand, that too is a typical liberal MO. lightbulb [IMG]http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f258/lara3ec/images-2.jpg[/IMG] [SIZE=7][B]out![/B][/SIZE] ... and God bless! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
Top