Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yawn" data-source="post: 835221" data-attributes="member: 13540"><p>I just see more questions <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>J E CUSTOM have you actually tried the two different ai gauges in the one saami chamber to prove the difference? ie refute the argument put forward in the video and preceding description ? </p><p>Given PO ackleys intention was to use a headspace .004 shorter than the parent case so wouldn't useing standard 280 rem in a saami create an .018 crush? Iv found .018 over length is significant when trying to close the bolt? Also I believe the original design was using a headspace datum on the neck shoulder junction?</p><p>while according to the saami drawing for the chamber its clearly back along the 40 deg shoulder a little.</p><p><a href="http://www.saami.org/pubresources/cc_drawings/Rifle/280%20Ackley%20Improved.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.saami.org/pubresources/cc_drawings/Rifle/280 Ackley Improved.pdf</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yawn, post: 835221, member: 13540"] I just see more questions :) J E CUSTOM have you actually tried the two different ai gauges in the one saami chamber to prove the difference? ie refute the argument put forward in the video and preceding description ? Given PO ackleys intention was to use a headspace .004 shorter than the parent case so wouldn't useing standard 280 rem in a saami create an .018 crush? Iv found .018 over length is significant when trying to close the bolt? Also I believe the original design was using a headspace datum on the neck shoulder junction? while according to the saami drawing for the chamber its clearly back along the 40 deg shoulder a little. [url]http://www.saami.org/pubresources/cc_drawings/Rifle/280%20Ackley%20Improved.pdf[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
Top