Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 Ack. Powders Vs. 30-06 Powders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Derek M." data-source="post: 883604" data-attributes="member: 2693"><p>It only takes SLIGHT differences in rifle calibers all using the same parent case to make a substantial difference. Here's a parallel: take your water hose and put the older spin on cap on it and tighten it down making the hole smaller. What happens? The same water spits out faster and flatter. </p><p></p><p>Take your question in the opposite direction. Compare the 30.06 and the 338-06. By your questioning, shouldn't H1000, and Retumbo work optimally in it? The answer is no, in fact, the powder burn rates get faster again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Derek M., post: 883604, member: 2693"] It only takes SLIGHT differences in rifle calibers all using the same parent case to make a substantial difference. Here's a parallel: take your water hose and put the older spin on cap on it and tighten it down making the hole smaller. What happens? The same water spits out faster and flatter. Take your question in the opposite direction. Compare the 30.06 and the 338-06. By your questioning, shouldn't H1000, and Retumbo work optimally in it? The answer is no, in fact, the powder burn rates get faster again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 Ack. Powders Vs. 30-06 Powders
Top