Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
270 WSM for Long Range Hunting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wbygunner" data-source="post: 362565" data-attributes="member: 14756"><p>I know it's the B.C. numbers that raise the bar on the 7's and 6.5's for comparison purposes, so I guess the question is, is it a big difference? The 270 WSM and Weatherby both have really good numbers on paper, but since the .270 bullets are not as high in the BC category, in comparison to the others mentioned, does that make it a "poor" long range performer or non-viable. A .270 bullet, with a .531 BC, at 3,000 FPS sounds pretty salty?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wbygunner, post: 362565, member: 14756"] I know it's the B.C. numbers that raise the bar on the 7's and 6.5's for comparison purposes, so I guess the question is, is it a big difference? The 270 WSM and Weatherby both have really good numbers on paper, but since the .270 bullets are not as high in the BC category, in comparison to the others mentioned, does that make it a "poor" long range performer or non-viable. A .270 bullet, with a .531 BC, at 3,000 FPS sounds pretty salty? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
270 WSM for Long Range Hunting?
Top