Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
264 WM for elk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flatwater bill" data-source="post: 1347945" data-attributes="member: 81090"><p>Captn..................your observation is right on..............manuals often list many poor powder choices for the overlooked 264, then comment on the modest results. One casual look at the case tells us that powders at least as slow as 4350, and a lot slower with big bullets, will give better density of charge, and better velocities. I used H4831 then went to 7828 as it came on the market. Retumbo and Re 25 will be likely candidates for my next loads with the 142 MKHP....................good shooting......FWB</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flatwater bill, post: 1347945, member: 81090"] Captn..................your observation is right on..............manuals often list many poor powder choices for the overlooked 264, then comment on the modest results. One casual look at the case tells us that powders at least as slow as 4350, and a lot slower with big bullets, will give better density of charge, and better velocities. I used H4831 then went to 7828 as it came on the market. Retumbo and Re 25 will be likely candidates for my next loads with the 142 MKHP....................good shooting......FWB [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
264 WM for elk
Top