Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
264 mag vs 6.5x284
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="liltank" data-source="post: 414572" data-attributes="member: 13275"><p>That is the very reason people put it on a LA. The long bullets aren't seated that deep in the casing when they are loaded rounds. Because of the OAL of a loaded round, they prefer the LA to use the magazine that allows for that length. Now if it was a single round rifle, then that thought is negated. A SA would work just fine for single feed.</p><p></p><p>Tank</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="liltank, post: 414572, member: 13275"] That is the very reason people put it on a LA. The long bullets aren't seated that deep in the casing when they are loaded rounds. Because of the OAL of a loaded round, they prefer the LA to use the magazine that allows for that length. Now if it was a single round rifle, then that thought is negated. A SA would work just fine for single feed. Tank [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
264 mag vs 6.5x284
Top