Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
220 Swift, twist rate, barrel length
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 1152834" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>jjmp, If I felt like apologizing is right I would. </p><p>But statements made earlier were so reckless, and so potentially costly to forum members, that dark flags were due.</p><p></p><p>Imagine someone picking up an understanding that high enough velocity means getting away with less twist. They get it from a friend, a forum, a magazine article,, -not the bullet maker.</p><p>They pay for a barrel & finishing and then chase their tail for months logging bad performance with this or that bullet, this or that condition. They might not even think 'stability' during load development(unless tumbling). When they do, they go back to forums and ask again, and they get "wrong twist", "you need to start over"! </p><p>And somehow it's obvious to everyone...</p><p></p><p>I don't want that happening to LRH members.</p><p>In my view they are better to go with bullet maker suggested, even if seemingly conservative.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 1152834, member: 1521"] jjmp, If I felt like apologizing is right I would. But statements made earlier were so reckless, and so potentially costly to forum members, that dark flags were due. Imagine someone picking up an understanding that high enough velocity means getting away with less twist. They get it from a friend, a forum, a magazine article,, -not the bullet maker. They pay for a barrel & finishing and then chase their tail for months logging bad performance with this or that bullet, this or that condition. They might not even think 'stability' during load development(unless tumbling). When they do, they go back to forums and ask again, and they get "wrong twist", "you need to start over"! And somehow it's obvious to everyone... I don't want that happening to LRH members. In my view they are better to go with bullet maker suggested, even if seemingly conservative. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
220 Swift, twist rate, barrel length
Top