Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
180 accubonds or partitions?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WildRose" data-source="post: 1250149" data-attributes="member: 30902"><p>Partition if you want to punch the shoulders and Accubond otherwise. The whole purpose for the creation of the Partition was to produce a bullet that would expand but still be capable of very deep penetration on heavy bodied and heavy boned animals such as moose and elk.</p><p></p><p>The accubond is also easier to load due to the boat tail and solid base and has a higher BC than partitions of the same caliber and weight. The 180gr Partition Spire point has a BC of .474 whereas the accubond shows to be .507; at least that's what Nosler lists them to be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WildRose, post: 1250149, member: 30902"] Partition if you want to punch the shoulders and Accubond otherwise. The whole purpose for the creation of the Partition was to produce a bullet that would expand but still be capable of very deep penetration on heavy bodied and heavy boned animals such as moose and elk. The accubond is also easier to load due to the boat tail and solid base and has a higher BC than partitions of the same caliber and weight. The 180gr Partition Spire point has a BC of .474 whereas the accubond shows to be .507; at least that's what Nosler lists them to be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
180 accubonds or partitions?
Top