Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
150 vs 168 Barnes TTSX 300 Weatherby
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="stx" data-source="post: 2152396" data-attributes="member: 21006"><p>With the cost of all our equipment and cost of hunting, I certainly wouldn't be worried about $.30 per bullet......especially at the terminal end of the Entire Hunt! I shot Barnes since the old X Bullet and have changed all of my Barnes loads over to Hammers! Hammers have even better penetration than Barnes due to no mushrooming of the petals and since the petals break off, you get the shrapnel effect causing even more damage. Once you compare the internal damage of Hammers compared to Barnes, you'll be sticking with the Hammers!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="stx, post: 2152396, member: 21006"] With the cost of all our equipment and cost of hunting, I certainly wouldn’t be worried about $.30 per bullet......especially at the terminal end of the Entire Hunt! I shot Barnes since the old X Bullet and have changed all of my Barnes loads over to Hammers! Hammers have even better penetration than Barnes due to no mushrooming of the petals and since the petals break off, you get the shrapnel effect causing even more damage. Once you compare the internal damage of Hammers compared to Barnes, you’ll be sticking with the Hammers! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
150 vs 168 Barnes TTSX 300 Weatherby
Top