Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
150 gr Scirocco vs 140 gr TSX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jon A" data-source="post: 34550" data-attributes="member: 319"><p>Let us know how the testing comes out. One thing--I understand that (at least in some calibers/weights) the nose profiles have changed on the TSX vs the XBT's including amoung other things a larger hollow point but Barnes seems to have left the (already inflated <img src="http://images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> ) advertised BC's the same.</p><p></p><p>In Rick Jamison's recent test, the 30 Cal 180 TSX got hammered compared with the Interbond (which was a 165!), AccuBond & Scirocco--even worse than the XBT did previously.</p><p></p><p>In any case, I'll be interested in your results. Those are my predictions.... <img src="http://images/icons/wink.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>On edit: Just for the fun of it, I'll put an actual number on the prediction: .425 -- Corrected for conditions the same way as the Swift measured .510</p><p></p><p>[ 07-13-2004: Message edited by: Jon A ]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jon A, post: 34550, member: 319"] Let us know how the testing comes out. One thing--I understand that (at least in some calibers/weights) the nose profiles have changed on the TSX vs the XBT's including amoung other things a larger hollow point but Barnes seems to have left the (already inflated [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] ) advertised BC's the same. In Rick Jamison's recent test, the 30 Cal 180 TSX got hammered compared with the Interbond (which was a 165!), AccuBond & Scirocco--even worse than the XBT did previously. In any case, I'll be interested in your results. Those are my predictions.... [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] On edit: Just for the fun of it, I'll put an actual number on the prediction: .425 -- Corrected for conditions the same way as the Swift measured .510 [ 07-13-2004: Message edited by: Jon A ] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
150 gr Scirocco vs 140 gr TSX
Top