Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
130 vs 150 vs 168 Barnes TTSX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the blur" data-source="post: 2880714" data-attributes="member: 79296"><p>I'm looking at the ballistics chart for .308, TTSX. It certainly appears the lighter bullet has a flatter trajectory, more energy, more velocity, just better all around.</p><p></p><p>Could it be heavier bullets just do not perform as well????</p><p></p><p>I did have a bad experience with the 168 TTSX. They didn't expand well out of my Tikka. Would I be better off with lighter copper ?</p><p></p><p>I only choose 168's because they are deadly accurate. So I never tried anything else.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the blur, post: 2880714, member: 79296"] I'm looking at the ballistics chart for .308, TTSX. It certainly appears the lighter bullet has a flatter trajectory, more energy, more velocity, just better all around. Could it be heavier bullets just do not perform as well???? I did have a bad experience with the 168 TTSX. They didn't expand well out of my Tikka. Would I be better off with lighter copper ? I only choose 168's because they are deadly accurate. So I never tried anything else. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Elk Hunting
130 vs 150 vs 168 Barnes TTSX
Top