Recent content by ontarget7

For what it’s worth, I’m jumping my 180’s .12 with excellent results so don’t feel you need to be tight to the lands

Might be testing out the 220’s very soon on elk.

Per side

On average .001 difference, Lapua being thicker

Colorado bound shortly

If I had a rifle that accuracy suffers after 25 rounds down the barrel I would just sell it.

Yeah, Zuckerberg can stick it ! Don’t do social media anymore. I will be more than likely testing some Hammers out thou. Have had some good reports from a few people I know.

Depending where your eye focus ends up when adjusting for you I can see that you’d see more black.

It’s a great looking buck so I’d take him all day long. I’m over the whole scoring game. If I like the animal, he’s getting shot and there’s no waiting in hopes he’ll survive another year. Especially, from what your describing. Chances are he more than likely won’t make it another year if he’s...

If you had black around the sight picture it simply was not set up for you and you did not have the correct eye relief

Mark 5 is tough to beat. I like them better than my NX8’s

I feel headspace is used two ways and both are appropriate but one is static per say measurement and the other a dynamic if that makes sense.

All good, brother ! I feel the two have been used throughout this thread and the reason I wanted to clarify. Thank You !

Just wanted to clarify. I could see that 👍🏼

For me, no downside to a good FFP scope.