Carbon fiber stocks

RockyMtnMT

Official LRH Sponsor
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
7,921
Location
Montana
Anybody know how to build them? I can't find anything from google, and I would like to learn how to do this.

Thanks,

Steve
 
Yep, I have made 6 now. Essentially they are the same as making a fibreglass stock. You won't find much on the net about them but it is just fibreglassing.
Read up all you can about how to make a two piece mold off a plug.
There is lots out there about using carbon fibre you just have to adapt it to rifle stocks.
I make a two piece mold off the stock. 4 layers of 6oz carbon fibre with west Systems 105/207, put 3-4 extra layers through the pistol grip area, then put it in a vacuum storage bag and suck the air out with a vacuum cleaner. join the two halves together once it is set (next day).
I make a cast of the action area of the original stock using a silicon modelling resin Wacker 4670. Put the cast in the stock and pour thickened resin around it, watch out it will get really, really hot if you pour too much in at once.
Once the halves are stuck together i glue in the swivel studs and then fill the butt and forearm with expanding polyurethane foam.
I make a fibreglass cast of the barrel channel and then lay several pieces of carbon fibre on it and put it into the stock.
Then tidy up all the areas where the resin and fibre didn't quite stick properly.
Then shape up the recoil pad and glue on using thickened resin.
It takes me about 6 weeks from go to whoa to do a stock.

Flick me a PM if you want.

Stu.
 
Any further information that you are willing to share on this subject? I am specifically trying to find out how many layers of CF are needed to withstand recoil force w/.308 bolt action. I am not trying to make a stock that has the same shape and dimensions as traditional stocks do so I need to know what a minimum, "safe" thickness is.
Thanks for any and all input.
Matt
 
Are you also using CF for the bedding and for sole support of pillars?
From what you write it sounds like the there is very little total thickness required to provide the strength that is needed. That in turn really opens up what can be done with "radical" design of the rifle stock, which is what I am researching. Am I interpreting what you wrote correctly?
Thanks.
 
Thanks. Can you also give me a general idea of the actual thickness of the thickest portion of CF that you recommend? Also, what about other areas of the stock such as the butt, handguard, etc? That helps me with design in terms of the minimum thickness dimensions that are required.
BTW, I've read elsewhere that people are for some reason advising against bedding the action with CF, although none give a reason for that so I have been assuming it is just a matter or preference or "this is the way we always do it" type mentality. Have you encountered any empirical data relating to the pros and cons of the type of CF bedding you mention?
Thanks.
 
It is 4 layers over the whole stock, apart from the pistol grip area. I use epoxy in the action because of the way I cast the action area. Haven't heard anything about not using carbon fibre to bed the action
 
By the way I was really just wondering how to make a custom mold and how much the resulting molded in carbon fiber will differentiate from the wooden pattern stock that was used to make the mold ? Also how does someone acquire tw carbon fiber which makes the actual stock? Thanks
 
I have a little experience but very little, helping make one of my radio controlled planes that is molded.

The RCGroups.com: The ABCs of Radio Control - Aircraft, Boats, and Cars! site should have lots of info.
There is shrinkage but it is miniscule.
AIUI Making the 'blank' and mold are the hardest part. A stock would be like a fuselage.

Carbon fiber 'prepreg' is a viable option. Search for it.

I hope that helps move you to the next phase.
 
Would a "homemade" carbon fiber rifle stock be able to handle the recoil of a 50 BMG ?
Sure, with metal inserts for recoil lug location and pillars. A larger aluminum 'frame' inside the CF would be better.

That is an engineering and manufacturing problem not a materials problem. The materials can take a great deal. Especially in compression.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top