Difference between standard Remington 700 and Sendero

codybrown

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
953
Location
Michigan
Is there a difference in the actions? I'm looking to get a rifle as a donor, so the barrel wont matter. If I buy a Sendero is there something upgraded in the action or is it trued, or would I just be paying extra money for the stock?
 
Like MMERS said, same action, different barrel, stock, and designation. It does seem, however, that the Senderos were put together with slightly more care and attention to details. I have seen 700's that wouldn't group well, but I've never seen a Sendero that wouldn't shoot, unless the barrel was shot-out.

If you're looking to build a rifle, the cheapest way possible would be to buy an SPS and go from there with an aftermarket barrel, and have the action trued.

However, you could always buy a Sendero and just have the action and barrel shoulder and threads trued for straightness and it should be a 1-holer if you get a good smith that knows his stuff. My smith knows how to make a "factory" Remington with a heavy barrel shoot. He trues the action and barrel, then beds everything into a good aftermarket stock, and then reinstalls them and somehow it shoots 1-hole groups.

Just my opinions and experiences.
 
I have one of the older Sendero's in .270 Win. No flutes and older HS stock.

I bedded the lug and rear tang. That was it. Shoots well with hand loads. It's about all I can afford in a long range rig.

If you are going to work on it, I wouldn't spend the money on the Sendero at least without shooting it first. I don't think they need it. I think Remington gives it pretty good QC.

I have been looking at the 5r in 300 WM though.

Shane
 
I have one of the older Sendero's in .270 Win. No flutes and older HS stock.

I bedded the lug and rear tang. That was it. Shoots well with hand loads. It's about all I can afford in a long range rig.

If you are going to work on it, I wouldn't spend the money on the Sendero at least without shooting it first. I don't think they need it. I think Remington gives it pretty good QC.

I have been looking at the 5r in 300 WM though.

Shane
I hear ya there, I shoot what I can afford.
 
I have one of the older Sendero's in .270 Win. No flutes and older HS stock.

I bedded the lug and rear tang. That was it. Shoots well with hand loads. It's about all I can afford in a long range rig.

If you are going to work on it, I wouldn't spend the money on the Sendero at least without shooting it first. I don't think they need it. I think Remington gives it pretty good QC.

I have been looking at the 5r in 300 WM though.

Shane
If you would like to get rid of the 270 win, plz let me know. Thanks
 
@Tbozz

Brother, that rifle is long gone. That thread is six years old...

Good luck finding one, but they are probably still out there. I actually built another 270 with an 8 twist barrel to shoot the heavy pills. That Sendero only had a 10 twist.

Shane
 
@Tbozz

Brother, that rifle is long gone. That thread is six years old...

Good luck finding one, but they are probably still out there. I actually built another 270 with an 8 twist barrel to shoot the heavy pills. That Sendero only had a 10 twist.

Shane
He posted the same thing in another thread from 2012, as well... Starting to wonder...
 
The story in advertisements was the Sendero came from the Remington Custom Shop, Not off the regular assemble line. The Stock on a Sendero 15 years ago was a H&S Precision stock, with the aluminum bedding block.
They used the standard lawyer proof production triggers in them.
Been There Done That, On a friends rifle.
 
The story in advertisements was the Sendero came from the Remington Custom Shop, Not off the regular assemble line. The Stock on a Sendero 15 years ago was a H&S Precision stock, with the aluminum bedding block.
They used the standard lawyer proof production triggers in them.
Been There Done That, On a friends rifle.
They used to be, and they still use HS Precision stocks with aluminum bedding blocks. The XMP triggers suck.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top