Why the 338 Lapua?

Engineering101

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
1,047
Location
Maple Valley, Washington
I've seen quite a few folks buying 338 Lapuas. I always wonder why when the 338 Edge or even a plain vanilla RUM seem to stack up better. The volume of the cases (per QuickLoad) in grains of water are:

108gr - 338 Lapua
110gr - 338 RUM
113gr - 338 Edge

Also, the bolt face is bigger on the Lapua which puts more force on the bolt at the same chamber pressure. Overall cartridge length for the Lapua is 3.681" per SAAMI standards versus 3.600 for the others so magazines and actions have to be slightly longer.

Lapua brass is hands down better than Remington brass, but that isn't an issue since Nosler came out with brass for the RUMs as it is excellent.

Also Nosler says in their latest handbook, "The 338 RUM delivers surprising accuracy for a large magnum cartridge. It has become the standard 338 caliber test round for the Nosler Ballistics Lab." They could have picked a lot of others including the Lapua as their standard – but didn't.

The highest velocity that each can drive a 250 Accubond in equal length barrels is 2,941 fps for the Lapua and 2,990 fps for the 338 RUM. (Nosler reloading guide number 7.)

From what I can see the 338 Lapua has only disadvantages compared to the 338 RUM let alone the Edge so what gives? The disadvantages are not large but still, why do they sell? Savage for example doesn't offer a 338 RUM but they build more than one Lapua model. What am I missing?
 
Well, I had a edge and while I liked it I got tired of brass issues (short life compaired to the lapua) so I sold it and built a Lapua. Nosler brass was just ok but Lapua brass is much better in my openion. SAAMI specs are for COAL and do not really mean much as the case length on the Lapua is shorter and easyer to to load in a mag and retain case capasity at the same COAL as the rum-edge. If the action used is a purpose built action than the bolt thrust is not really an issue. If you re building on a remington then the RUM and Edge obviously get the nod. I prefer the lapua only because of brass and the abilty to improve the case and gain performance. Now with Shawns brass the edge has an even more valid argument.
 
I second the brass issues, Lapua Brass is second to non. the consistency between cases is in credible and if you research all the things Lapua does to make there brass the best Like neck thickness, drilled flash holes for the primer you will answer your question your self. and velocity isn't the key with Long to extreme range consistency is. So when you press a bullet into a lapua case and check run out and get less than a half of a thousandth your are a believer.
 
MontanaRifleman

These volumes are for fireformed brass. You need this info for QuickLoad to get the most accurate results as I believe it uses minimum dimensions by default otherwise (which is what I listed above).
 
Wiki showed 114 -lapua,113-rum,and I have seen 110 posted on edge.My 338 Norma holds 108 h20 and is clearly shorter than lapua.I shoot 2725-50 with 87.5 retumbo and am on 7 reloads.They all split hairs with barrel length and how much you want to push your brass.The lapua is also adopted in about 20 countries.
 
I would add that the new Betram brass Shawn Carlock has for the 338 Edge is a game changer as well. Brass is no longer an issue with the Edge!

I have am a Lapua and Edge fan both. I have used both and until Shawn"s brass the Lapua had the EDGE. No pun intended with brass life for sure. I have some of the new edge brass on the way and will be setting up a new edge next week for a friend. I agree this is going to level the playing field and look forward to results.

Jeff
 
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top