Devcon 10110 vs 10270?

TheRoaminRaider

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2010
Messages
90
Location
Dallas, Tx
I'm pretty sure I know the answer to this, but better safe than sorry.

I was about to order some 10110 steel putty when I saw the 10270 stainless steel putty, and then I got to thinking. I guess I have always thought that the difference between the devcon steel and the devcon stainless was really just cosmetics (color matching), something that really wouldn't apply to bedding a rifle. But when I saw that the price of the 10270 was nearly double the 10110, and that it was "non-rusting" and certified for food production, I thought there maybe something more to this.

Is there any benefits to using the stainless putty over the regular steel putty when bedding a stainless rifle? How about a blued or otherwise-coated rifle? Any drawbacks to either? Or am I just way overthinking this now, and there is no real difference? (at least was it comes to bedding)
 
Is there any benefits to using the stainless putty over the regular steel putty when bedding a stainless rifle? How about a blued or otherwise-coated rifle? Any drawbacks to either? Or am I just way overthinking this now, and there is no real difference? (at least was it comes to bedding)

Have used the 10110 Devcon to bed a number of rifles without a problem... Can't imagine anything that the SS version would add that would be worth the extra cost...
 
Me too; always use 10110, and no problem with it. Never heard of 10270, so I googled it, and here is what I found:

Description: A stainless steel-filled epoxy for rebuilding and repairing stainless steel equipment.
Intended Use: Repairs cracks, dents, and breaks in stainless steel machinery or castings; rebuilds dairy equipment; repairs stainless
steel holding tanks
Product
features:
Acceptable for use in meat and poultry plants
Machinable to metallic finish
NSF® Approved (Certified to ANSI/NSF61)
Resistant to chemicals and most acids, bases, solvents, and alkalis

Sounds like its for use in stainless steel equipment, not gun stocks.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top