I tried the scirocco, but my rifle preferred accubonds. I haven't tried barnes bullets just because they have a lower BC than the berger bullets or polymer tipped lead bullets.
I like the accubond bullets because they open very quickly. I have shot many coyotes with the accubonds and they provide alot of shock becaust they open so fast but then retain most of their weight to penetrate. I don't want a bullet to retain 90%, I like having the bullet shed some shrapnel and do additional damage while passing through an animal, and I want exit wounds on all big game.
I have taken 6 deer with the 140gr accubonds in 7mm Rem Mag, and helped on 1 elk we shot with the 160gr accubonds. I've never recovered an accubond from a deer, but we recovered 5 from the elk. My friend shot the elk behind the shoulder at 350yds and it started off into a canyon it would have been hell to get him out of. I joined in the shooting after the first hit and we ended up putting 5 shots into the bull, 3 lung shots and 2 into the flank when he turned before dropping him 15 yds from the rim. The bull traveled about 125yds from the first shot. All the bullets recovered were perfectly mushroomed and retained 50-70% of their weight. A heavier or stouter bullet that retained 90 or 100% of it's weight may have penetrated better in this case. The only elk I ever shot myself fell to a 175gr soft point from the 7 mag at 468yds and exited the bull.
The accubonds performed perfectly as advertised but lacked the energy to exit the elk at that range. They did the job well, but I plan to shoot a 30 cal magnum with 200gr accubonds next time I go after elk because I want the exit wounds. For anything smaller than elk a 140gr accubond from a .264, .277, or .284 bore started at 3000fps plus is my favorite recipe. Lighter recoil than the heavy bullets and pass through performance.