Long range with a sporter barrel ?

Overkill338

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
1,790
Location
Virginia
Is it possible to shoot 500+ yards with a .650 barrel ? My .300 Win Mag, shoots great with it's stock .655" barrel, best group being a 0.66" 3 shot group, with a warm barrel. Just wondering if it can be accurate further out, or if I do need to replace the barrel. Been talking to Ed Harren about doing a rebarrel to a #6 contour 26" Shilen. Just hate to change it while it is shooting so good.
 
Skinny barrels can be just as accurate as fat ones. Especially for hunting, where the barrel can cool completely between shots. I wouldn't swap it out just because it's thin. If it's shooting well, keep using it until it dies.

I have a sporter weight 7mm RM that is scary accurate.

AJ
 
Here is my Ruger .300 in a Hogue stock

MKII.jpg



The .300 and .338 Win Mag twins.

300_338_2.jpg
 
I see nothing wrong with using your rifle for a long shot. Your first shot is what counts. Your not shooting a long string of shots. A heavy rifle will set still better than a light one; but if your steady on the shot it's GTG.
 
Is it possible to shoot 500+ yards with a .650 barrel ? My .300 Win Mag, shoots great with it's stock .655" barrel, best group being a 0.66" 3 shot group, with a warm barrel. Just wondering if it can be accurate further out, or if I do need to replace the barrel. Been talking to Ed Harren about doing a rebarrel to a #6 contour 26" Shilen. Just hate to change it while it is shooting so good.


Yes, very possible!
Have you tried shooting 2-shot groups with it @ 500 + yards on steel yet?
 
Heck yes you can use a sporter bbl. I've had equal luck with repeatable accuracy. Here's my 100 and 200 yard targets with a 270 measuring 0.630 at the muzzle. 150 VLDs and IMR4350. Can't shoot any further than that until I get permission on another place. Rifle, scoped and loaded might way 6.5 pounds.

150VLD270wolfload2.jpg

200yard270Rem150VLDIMR4350215M.jpg
 
Derek, that is some great shooting !

Thanks. It's not as good as a lot of other guys of course but this rifle happens to be my favorite. It's a 270 built by Greg Richards, former owner of Broughton barrels. Blueprinted 700 with a Jim Borden Rimrock stock, which I like equally if not more than a McMillan. Scope is a Leupold 4.5x14x40 After I repeated both 100 and 200 yrd targets on different days, I decided to take a picture. You know what they say, it "lasts longer."

I have 3 more pounds of this lot of IMR4350 and 110 more bullets from same lot number.

I bump the shoulder back .001 or not at all if sized case will still chamber. I seat every bullet and check them in an RCBS precision mic and seat them all to the exact same thousandth, even if it means backing the microseating adjustment back out a few thou.

100 yard group measured 0.137 center to center.
 
Derek, that is one great shootin hunting gun!

i just received a 28" Bartlein that's only .600 out toward the end, it has a reverse taper making it .72 at the muzzle to install a brake. i sure hope a smaller barrel can shoot good!
 
Last edited:
Yes, very possible!
Have you tried shooting 2-shot groups with it @ 500 + yards on steel yet?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I practice shooting w/ two and three shot groups [couples and trio's] .

I place my three steel targets at different ranges and walk to an unknown distance then range and dial the scope -then shoot two shots.
I'm a walking hunter so sporterweight rifles are the best choice and they can be very accurate.
 
Derek, that is one great shootin hunting gun!

i just received a 28" Bartlein that's only .600 out toward the end, it has a reverse taper making it .72 at the muzzle to install a brake. i sure hope a smaller barrel can shoot good!

Unfortunately Greg stopped building rifles. However, Dave Bruno has built 2 for my friend who's going on the wolf hunt, and will be building 2 for me shortly as soon as all parts come in. Dave knows how to build a rifle too.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top