Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Magazine Articles > Gun Reviews - Discussion


Reply

Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-15-2013, 03:46 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 963
Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

Quote:
Bill Ruger, 1916-2002, was and will always be a giant in the firearms industry. Like those who lived through the great depression era, he had a tremendous work ethic. Along with firearms he loved to collect fine old cars. He loved the fine lines of these cars. Even though his first firearm design was a pistol, his baby was the Ruger #1. He would listen to hunters and shooters for ideas. There were a lot of hunters that would appreciate a rifle that they could carry in the woods on stalks which might possibly end in a single well placed shot on their game. Bill Ruger's ability to listen to the needs and desires of shooters and hunters was one of his great attributes. Read More...
This is a thread for discussion of the article, Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review, By John Johnston. Here you can ask questions or make comments about the article.
__________________


What's new at the...

Long Range Hunting Gear and Supplies
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2013, 08:42 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Henderson,NV
Posts: 13
Re: Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

I love the No1. Now I have an excuse to get a new one. Give my son my the 243 No1, my daughter the model70 243wssm, and my self the new Ruger . Now how to pay for it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2013, 09:40 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Texas
Posts: 152
Re: Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

I shot a 8pt with this rifle on 11-12-13 at 150+ yards. He dropped like a rock, one shot. I could not find entrance or exit on hide. I was aiming high shoulder. That is why I like Bergers. John Johnston
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2013, 09:42 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Texas
Posts: 152
Re: Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

If you want a #1 in 6.5x284 I suggest you get as soon as you can. Like the 6.5 Creedmoor, it may be a one year run.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-16-2013, 11:03 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Henderson,NV
Posts: 13
Re: Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

I shot my 4X4 muley with my 243 No1 at 167yds, with the bergers 95gr hvld, recovered the jacket on the opposite side between the skin and hide. Very impressed with the bullet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-17-2013, 12:13 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Norway, Buskerud
Posts: 327
Re: Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

Thank you for a very good and detailed review! Personally, I do love all these slick, handy and precise falling blocks like the Ruger #1 or single shot break actions. You made the Ruger #1 indeed real tempting for me. Calibre wise I'd prefer 7mm or maybe a 30R Blaser.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-17-2013, 12:41 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Texas
Posts: 152
Re: Ruger #1 in 6.5-284 Review

Ruger has definitely got it together on the #1. I have owned a few older models that were not quite as accurate as the ones coming out lately. I have shot a lot of single shot rifles, that is how I got the nickname "Olsingleshot". I prefer the falling block action in comparison to the break open. I find the falling block more accurate. Maybe that is because you do not need to take it off the rest to reload. The Sharps I owned was extremely accurate. The Wickliffe I own is another accurate falling block. I have found that for me ,personally, the #1 does not handle recoil well in bigger calibers, especially in magnum calibers. But that is for me and it may not bother you.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you wear hearing protection while hunting?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC