Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Elk Hunting

Elk Hunting Techniques For Elk Hunting


Reply

Energy vs. Energy Transfer

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 05-01-2014, 09:24 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ohio
Posts: 635
Re: Energy vs. Energy Transfer

yes the larger the surface area the better transfer but you have to consider design you can't tell me that a solid vs. A soft point won't have a different transfer that's all I'm saying I can tear a hole in something with a bullet at 2300fps and penatrate with good hydrostatic shock then take the same bullet at 3000fps and it splash on the hide and not penetrate.bullet design and velocity will determine how the energy is transferred the op. Was asking about energy transfer. Your implying about bigger is better, we know bigger is better I'm talking about how energy is transfered with the same exact bullet transferring its energy with the only variable beeing velocity
.
__________________
"those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not" Thomas Jefferson.

an armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

guns have only two enemies, rust and politicians

know guns,know peace,know safety.no guns,no peace,no safety...

The second amendment is in place incase the politicians ignore the others


Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

For those who trade liberty for security have neither Benjamin Franklin...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-01-2014, 09:43 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ohio
Posts: 635
Re: Energy vs. Energy Transfer

wait a minute, are we talkin about wound channels or energy transfer because I can put a big hole in something with my bow at about 60 ft.lbs of energy?
__________________
"those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not" Thomas Jefferson.

an armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

guns have only two enemies, rust and politicians

know guns,know peace,know safety.no guns,no peace,no safety...

The second amendment is in place incase the politicians ignore the others


Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

For those who trade liberty for security have neither Benjamin Franklin...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-02-2014, 05:40 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Lunas, NM
Posts: 133
Re: Energy vs. Energy Transfer

For my two cents there is no such thing as knock down power. The amount of energy a bullet has is less than the recoil energy. The amount of force accelerating from zero to 3000 fps in 2 feet is the same a de-accelerating the same thing from 3000 fps in the same distance. The bullet is going slower at the target than the muzzle so is less energy. I haven't been knocked down by a rifle yet shooting offhand. Now if someone would like to explain how the energy gets created for this "knock down" effect to occur I would like to hear it. Remember energy can not be created or destroyed only transformed.

If you are really interested in learning about this thread read Dr. Martin Factler's books. He is an expert in the area of wound channels and terminal ballistics.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-03-2014, 05:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 18
Re: Energy vs. Energy Transfer

Yea you want a wound channel to destroy tissue. Get knocked down by high energy transfer with a medicine ball; no big deal. Get complete penetration through the body with a hypodermic; ouch, but no big deal. Get shot with a low energy/low velocity broadhead/ DEAD. Substitute performance of a bullet and, well, you get the point.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 30.29%
53 Votes
NO - 54.86%
96 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 14.86%
26 Votes
Total Votes: 175
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC